38-216

Síndrome del túnel radial. Epicondilitis resistente

Radial tunnel syndrome. “Resistant tennis elbow”

C. SIMÓN PÉREZ (2), J.I. RODRÍGUEZ MATEOS (3), M.A. MARTÍN FERRERO (1), J.M. LOMO GARROTE(2), J.M. TRIGUEROS LARREA (2). (1) PROFESOR TITULAR DE TRAUMATOLOGÍA Y CIRUGÍA ORTOPÉDICA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE VALLADOLID. JEFE DE SECCIÓN DE MANO Y NERVIO PERIFÉRICO HOSPITAL CLÍNICO UNIVERSITARIO DE VALLADOLID. (2) RESIDENTE DE TRAUMATOLOGÍA Y CIRUGÍA ORTOPÉDICA DEL HOSPITAL CLÍNICO UNIVERSITARIO DE VALLADOLID. (3) RESIDENTE DE CIRUGÍA PLÁSTICA Y REPARADORA DEL HOSPITAL GENERAL YAGUE DE BURGOS. DEPARTAMENTO DE TRAUMATOLOGÍA Y CIRUGÍA ORTOPÉDICA DEL HOSPITAL CLÍNICO UNIVERSITARIO DE VALLADOLID.
Recepción:
16/09/2008
Aceptación:
16/09/2008
Publicación:
16/09/2008


Métricas


68

Visualizaciones


1

Descargas


Compartir

Compartir

Resumen (ES)

Between 1996 and 2003, 25 patients (26 extremities)
underwent descompression of the radial tunnel. All procedures
were performed at the same surgeon and the same institution
using posterior approach. The total 25 patients were
available for follow-up evalution after surgery (range 4
months - 6 years and 4 months) with average of 22 months.
The outcomes was determined using the original criteria of
Roles and Mausdley, 12 patients were rated as excellent
(46.15%), 9 patientes had good results (34.61%) and 5 patients
had fair results. Eleven patients were treated previously of
tennis elbow. Most of the patients were satisfied and felt subjectively
improved by the surgery. They obtained pain relief
and better functional status after surgery.

Palabras clave (ES):

Nervioso
Resistente
Atropamiento
Síndrome
Túnel
Radial
Epicondilitis
Compresión
Nervio
Nerviosa
Canalicular

Resumen (EN)

Between 1996 and 2003, 25 patients (26 extremities)
underwent descompression of the radial tunnel. All procedures
were performed at the same surgeon and the same institution
using posterior approach. The total 25 patients were
available for follow-up evalution after surgery (range 4
months - 6 years and 4 months) with average of 22 months.
The outcomes was determined using the original criteria of
Roles and Mausdley, 12 patients were rated as excellent
(46.15%), 9 patientes had good results (34.61%) and 5 patients
had fair results. Eleven patients were treated previously of
tennis elbow. Most of the patients were satisfied and felt subjectively
improved by the surgery. They obtained pain relief
and better functional status after surgery.

Explorar

Artículos


Volúmenes


Sobre la revista


Más leídos

Surgiceloma como complicación de tenodesis extraarticular de Lemaire modificada asociada a ligamentoplastia del cruzado anterior

Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular


Uso de placa puente dorsal: una alternativa en fracturas de muñeca catastróficas

Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular


No todo es "cut-out": reclasificación de las complicaciones mecánicas del tornillo cefálico del clavo intramedular.

Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular


Solución límite para recambio de prótesis total de cadera con cotilo osteointegrado: presentación de casos

Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular


Radioterapia a bajas dosis en artrosis: ¿una opción terapéutica real o un efecto placebo sofisticado?

Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular