Introduction. To treat proximal humerus fractures in patients with osteoporosis, the last few years, systems to improve implant stability by augmentation techniques have been developed. The aim of this study is to analyze the results obtained with the surgical technique employed. Materials and methods. Retrospective descriptive study. We selected 7 patients with 3 or 4- part fractures treated operatively with Philos Augmentation plate (Synthes)® fixation technique. Average follow-up was 12 months. Results. Pain measured with a Visual Analogical Scale (VAS) got a average value of 4,4. The mean Quick Dash Score was 47,47. The mean Constat-Murley modified was 36,36. The active articular balances showed a mean abduction of 91º; mean anterior flexion of 105º; mean external rotation of 44,14º; and finally the internal rotation achieved in three patients got to S1, in two patients to L5, in one patient to L2 and in other patient to T10. In X- Ray post-operative controls we can appreciate the reduction maintenance. In one case we observe a partial consolidation of the fracture. Conclusion. Surgical techniques that imply implant augmentation reduces the risk of implant failure and maintains the fracture reduction.

Introduction. To treat proximal humerus fractures in patients with osteoporosis, the last few years, systems to improve implant stability by augmentation techniques have been developed. The aim of this study is to analyze the results obtained with the surgical technique employed. Materials and methods. Retrospective descriptive study. We selected 7 patients with 3 or 4- part fractures treated operatively with Philos Augmentation plate (Synthes)® fixation technique. Average follow-up was 12 months. Results. Pain measured with a Visual Analogical Scale (VAS) got a average value of 4,4. The mean Quick Dash Score was 47,47. The mean Constat-Murley modified was 36,36. The active articular balances showed a mean abduction of 91º; mean anterior flexion of 105º; mean external rotation of 44,14º; and finally the internal rotation achieved in three patients got to S1, in two patients to L5, in one patient to L2 and in other patient to T10. In X- Ray post-operative controls we can appreciate the reduction maintenance. In one case we observe a partial consolidation of the fracture. Conclusion. Surgical techniques that imply implant augmentation reduces the risk of implant failure and maintains the fracture reduction.