50-264

Cerclajes y enclavado intramedular en fracturas subtrocantéreas: ¿Vascularización femoral o reducción anatómica?

Cerclage wiring and Intramedullary Nails in subtrochanteric fractures: Blood supply or anatomical reduction?

R. VINCES VIDAL, S. MALTORELL MATOSES, G. GASTALDI LLORENS, A. BRU POMER
Recepción:
22/02/2016
Aceptación:
22/02/2016
Publicación:
22/02/2016


Métricas


55

Visualizaciones


Compartir

Compartir

Resumen (ES)

Our goal is to assess the benefit and the clinical and radiological outcomes of using cerclage and intramedullary nail in subtrochanteric fractures type IIIA of Seinsheimer and comparing with a control group. Two groups of 19 patients (cerclage group and non-cerclage group) were used and the following results were obtained; anatomic reduction rates 89.5% and 84.2; consolidation rates 100% and 94.7%; mean healing time 20 and 23.9 weeks. Our mean Harris Hip Score were 62.7 and 68.3; and a complication rate of 5.2% and 21%. The results suggest that the use of cerclage in subtrochanteric fractures does not negatively influence in the rate of consolidation, infection or complications as opposed to a subotpimal reduction. Nevertheless we emphasize open reduction and cerclage wiring after the attempt of closed reduction, and always taking care of soft tissues.

Palabras clave (ES):

intramedularClavo
cerrojadoCerclaje

Resumen (EN)

Our goal is to assess the benefit and the clinical and radiological outcomes of using cerclage and intramedullary nail in subtrochanteric fractures type IIIA of Seinsheimer and comparing with a control group. Two groups of 19 patients (cerclage group and non-cerclage group) were used and the following results were obtained; anatomic reduction rates 89.5% and 84.2; consolidation rates 100% and 94.7%; mean healing time 20 and 23.9 weeks. Our mean Harris Hip Score were 62.7 and 68.3; and a complication rate of 5.2% and 21%. The results suggest that the use of cerclage in subtrochanteric fractures does not negatively influence in the rate of consolidation, infection or complications as opposed to a subotpimal reduction. Nevertheless we emphasize open reduction and cerclage wiring after the attempt of closed reduction, and always taking care of soft tissues.

Explorar

Artículos


Volúmenes


Sobre la revista


Más leídos

Surgiceloma como complicación de tenodesis extraarticular de Lemaire modificada asociada a ligamentoplastia del cruzado anterior

Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular


Uso de placa puente dorsal: una alternativa en fracturas de muñeca catastróficas

Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular


No todo es "cut-out": reclasificación de las complicaciones mecánicas del tornillo cefálico del clavo intramedular.

Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular


Solución límite para recambio de prótesis total de cadera con cotilo osteointegrado: presentación de casos

Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular


Radioterapia a bajas dosis en artrosis: ¿una opción terapéutica real o un efecto placebo sofisticado?

Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular