45-244
Valoración clínica de resultados en artrodesis trapecio-metacarpiana: placa atornillada vs agujas de kirschner.
Clinical results evaluation in trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis: plate and screws versus k-wires.
J.C. BORRÁS CEBRIÁN, J. LÓPEZ VALENCIANO, D. MONTANER ALONSO SERVICIO DE CIRUGÍA ORTOPÉDICA Y TRAUMATOLOGÍA. HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DOCTOR PESET. VALENCIA.
Recepción:
21/02/2011
Aceptación:
21/02/2011
Publicación:
24/02/2011
Métricas
46
Visualizaciones
Compartir
Compartir
Resumen (ES)
Trapezio-metacarpal arthritis is common. In that cases in which has failed to respond to conservativemeasures we need to use surgical procedures. One of them is the trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis. Retrospectivstudy 44 patients (57 arthrodeses), comparing two surgical arthrodesis procedures, K-wires versus plate and screws,to assess the efficacy of these procedures with respect to patient satisfaction, radiological and clinical outcomes. Averageage was 56.5 5.9 years. 33 K-wires, 24 plate and screws. There were an improvement in quetionaires results VAS(4.8 3.4) and DASH (23.2 23.5). The 44.7 % of patients scored a 10 in Kapandji test. We found no statistical differenceesbetween these procedures in non-union rate, functional outcome or complications. For most patients Trapeziometacarpalarthrodesis reduces pain, improves function and results in excellent patient satisfaction. We have foundno differences between these procedures in our study.
Palabras clave (ES):
Artrodesis
Trapeciometacarpiana
Rizoartrosis
Tratamiento
quirúrgico.
Resumen (EN)
Trapezio-metacarpal arthritis is common. In that cases in which has failed to respond to conservativemeasures we need to use surgical procedures. One of them is the trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis. Retrospectivstudy 44 patients (57 arthrodeses), comparing two surgical arthrodesis procedures, K-wires versus plate and screws,to assess the efficacy of these procedures with respect to patient satisfaction, radiological and clinical outcomes. Averageage was 56.5 5.9 years. 33 K-wires, 24 plate and screws. There were an improvement in quetionaires results VAS(4.8 3.4) and DASH (23.2 23.5). The 44.7 % of patients scored a 10 in Kapandji test. We found no statistical differenceesbetween these procedures in non-union rate, functional outcome or complications. For most patients Trapeziometacarpalarthrodesis reduces pain, improves function and results in excellent patient satisfaction. We have foundno differences between these procedures in our study.
Explorar
Artículos
Volúmenes
Sobre la revista
Más leídos
Surgiceloma como complicación de tenodesis extraarticular de Lemaire modificada asociada a ligamentoplastia del cruzado anterior
Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular
Uso de placa puente dorsal: una alternativa en fracturas de muñeca catastróficas
Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular
No todo es "cut-out": reclasificación de las complicaciones mecánicas del tornillo cefálico del clavo intramedular.
Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular
Solución límite para recambio de prótesis total de cadera con cotilo osteointegrado: presentación de casos
Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular
Radioterapia a bajas dosis en artrosis: ¿una opción terapéutica real o un efecto placebo sofisticado?
Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular