27-159
Fiabilidad diagnóstica comparativa de la mielografía y de la tomografía axial computarizada en la hernia discal lumbar
COMPARATIVE DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF SCAN AND MYELOGRAPHY IN LUMBAR DISC HERNIATION
C. BARRIOS*, L. AGUILELLA*, J.I. AEROTEGUI** y A. BJÖRNSSON** Instituto de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología. Valencia*. Departamento de Neurocirugía. Hospital Karolinska. Estocolmo. Suecia .
Recepción:
04/02/2009
Aceptación:
04/02/2009
Publicación:
09/02/2009
Métricas
53
Visualizaciones
Compartir
Compartir
Resumen (ES)
In order to compare the diagnostic accuracy of CT scan and myelography, a series of 137 patients with herniated lumbar disc was retrospectively analyzed matching the surgical findings with the images obtained by both diagnostic techniques. There were 76 h e r n i a t e d d i s c s at the L5-S1 l e v e l and 61 at the L4-L5. Preoperatively, 99 patients were assessed by CT scan and 77 by mielography. In 39 cases, both techniques were performed. The diagnostic accuracy, quantified by the percentage of "true positive" results was similar in both techniques: 89% in CT scan and 90% in mielography. In 12 of the 39 patients explored by both CT scan and myelography, the results were discordant. "False negative" cases were not found using CT scan. In conclusion, both CT scan and myelography provide equal high diagnostic accuracy for lumbar herniated disc. However, CT scan has become the primary diagnostic tool because of several advantages, such as the confort for the patients and the lack of adverse reactions.
Palabras clave (ES):
Fiabilidad
Raquis
Disco
Intervertebral
Diagnóstico
Diagnóstica
Mielografía
Tomografía
Axial
Hernia
Discal
Lumbar
Resumen (EN)
In order to compare the diagnostic accuracy of CT scan and myelography, a series of 137 patients with herniated lumbar disc was retrospectively analyzed matching the surgical findings with the images obtained by both diagnostic techniques. There were 76 h e r n i a t e d d i s c s at the L5-S1 l e v e l and 61 at the L4-L5. Preoperatively, 99 patients were assessed by CT scan and 77 by mielography. In 39 cases, both techniques were performed. The diagnostic accuracy, quantified by the percentage of "true positive" results was similar in both techniques: 89% in CT scan and 90% in mielography. In 12 of the 39 patients explored by both CT scan and myelography, the results were discordant. "False negative" cases were not found using CT scan. In conclusion, both CT scan and myelography provide equal high diagnostic accuracy for lumbar herniated disc. However, CT scan has become the primary diagnostic tool because of several advantages, such as the confort for the patients and the lack of adverse reactions.
Explorar
Artículos
Volúmenes
Sobre la revista
Más leídos
Surgiceloma como complicación de tenodesis extraarticular de Lemaire modificada asociada a ligamentoplastia del cruzado anterior
Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular
Uso de placa puente dorsal: una alternativa en fracturas de muñeca catastróficas
Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular
No todo es "cut-out": reclasificación de las complicaciones mecánicas del tornillo cefálico del clavo intramedular.
Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular
Solución límite para recambio de prótesis total de cadera con cotilo osteointegrado: presentación de casos
Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular
Radioterapia a bajas dosis en artrosis: ¿una opción terapéutica real o un efecto placebo sofisticado?
Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular