40-223

Abordaje posterior vs lateral en artroplastia total de cadera. Estudio prospectivo, aleatorizado y ciego

Posterior vs lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. Blinded, prospectiveand randomized study

JR. VARELA-EGOCHEAGA, MA. SUÁREZ-SUÁREZ, MA. ÁLVAREZ-VEGA, ME. ÁLVAREZ-RICO, F. FERRERO-MANZANAL, M. MONTERO-DÍAZ, A. MURCIA-MAZÓN. SERVICIO DE CIRUGÍA ORTOPÉDICA Y TRAUMATOLOGÍA, HOSPITAL DE CABUEÑES, GIJÓN.
Recepción:
15/09/2008
Aceptación:
15/09/2008
Publicación:
15/09/2008


Métricas


65

Visualizaciones


Compartir

Compartir

Resumen (ES)

Prospective, blinded and randomized study with 54
patients comparing posterior and lateral approaches for THA,
two groups were created with similar age, gender, weight,
BMI, diagnosis, Harris Hip Score, type of prosthesis and postoperatively
management. Results: no differences were found
in postoperatively global function, blood loss, blood transfusions,
postoperatively stay, radiographic results or complications.
We have found differences between both groups in
postoperatively pain with less pain-killers consumed in the
lateral approach, and bigger acetabular cups in posterior
approach. Conclusions: both approaches are excellent for
THA but bigger cups was implanted with posterior approach
with less risk and patients operated by lateral approach consumed
less pain-killers.

Palabras clave (ES):

prospectivo
Abordaje
Vía
de
acceso
Estudio
Lateral
Posterior
Abordaje
total
Artroplastia
Prótesis
Cadera

Resumen (EN)

Prospective, blinded and randomized study with 54
patients comparing posterior and lateral approaches for THA,
two groups were created with similar age, gender, weight,
BMI, diagnosis, Harris Hip Score, type of prosthesis and postoperatively
management. Results: no differences were found
in postoperatively global function, blood loss, blood transfusions,
postoperatively stay, radiographic results or complications.
We have found differences between both groups in
postoperatively pain with less pain-killers consumed in the
lateral approach, and bigger acetabular cups in posterior
approach. Conclusions: both approaches are excellent for
THA but bigger cups was implanted with posterior approach
with less risk and patients operated by lateral approach consumed
less pain-killers.

Explorar

Artículos


Volúmenes


Sobre la revista


Más leídos

Surgiceloma como complicación de tenodesis extraarticular de Lemaire modificada asociada a ligamentoplastia del cruzado anterior

Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular


Uso de placa puente dorsal: una alternativa en fracturas de muñeca catastróficas

Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular


No todo es "cut-out": reclasificación de las complicaciones mecánicas del tornillo cefálico del clavo intramedular.

Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular


Solución límite para recambio de prótesis total de cadera con cotilo osteointegrado: presentación de casos

Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular


Radioterapia a bajas dosis en artrosis: ¿una opción terapéutica real o un efecto placebo sofisticado?

Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular