29-174
Tratamiento de las fracturas abiertas de libia, grados I y II. Estudio comparativo entre enclavijado con Ender y fijación externa
TREATMENT OF GRADE I-II OPEN FRACTURES OF THE TIBIAL SHAFT. A COMPARISON BETWEEN ENDER NAILING AND EXTERNAL FIXATION
A. J. GARBAYO MARTURET, J. REDIN BARANDIARAN* y J. J. USOZ ALFARO* Sección de Traumatología y Cirugía Ortopédica, Hospital de Estella (Navarra) y * Servicio de Traumatología y Cirugía Ortopédica, Hospital de Navarra, Pamplona.
Recepción:
09/01/2009
Aceptación:
09/01/2009
Publicación:
09/01/2009
Métricas
52
Visualizaciones
Compartir
Compartir
Resumen (ES)
A total of 73 (grade I-II) open fractures of the tibial shaft, 41 treated by Endernailing and 32 with external fixation, were retrospectively studied. Regarding the type of boneexposition, fractures were classified according to Gustilo. Fractures were also grouped followingAO criteria with regard to the fracture line. Different factors such as time period for fracturehealing, delay in union, pseudoarthrosis, infection, and functional disability were assessedin both groups of patients. Fractures treated by flexible endomedullar nailing had a mean timeperiod for healing of 3,3 months. There was no cases with union delay, but 4 patients (10%)developed pseudoarthrosis. In fractures treated with external fixation the mean time period forconsolidation was 4.1 months. In this group, there were 2 cases (6%) disclosing delay in unionand 6 developing pseudoarthrosis (19%). In absence of infection, endomedullary flexible nailinghas been shown to give better results than external fixation in the healing process of gradeI-II open fractures of the tibial shaft.
Palabras clave (ES):
Enclavado
Tibia
Fijador
Fijación
Abierta
Tratamiento
externo
Enclavijamiento
externa
Osteotaxis
Fractura
Ender
Resumen (EN)
A total of 73 (grade I-II) open fractures of the tibial shaft, 41 treated by Endernailing and 32 with external fixation, were retrospectively studied. Regarding the type of boneexposition, fractures were classified according to Gustilo. Fractures were also grouped followingAO criteria with regard to the fracture line. Different factors such as time period for fracturehealing, delay in union, pseudoarthrosis, infection, and functional disability were assessedin both groups of patients. Fractures treated by flexible endomedullar nailing had a mean timeperiod for healing of 3,3 months. There was no cases with union delay, but 4 patients (10%)developed pseudoarthrosis. In fractures treated with external fixation the mean time period forconsolidation was 4.1 months. In this group, there were 2 cases (6%) disclosing delay in unionand 6 developing pseudoarthrosis (19%). In absence of infection, endomedullary flexible nailinghas been shown to give better results than external fixation in the healing process of gradeI-II open fractures of the tibial shaft.
Explorar
Artículos
Volúmenes
Sobre la revista
Más leídos
Surgiceloma como complicación de tenodesis extraarticular de Lemaire modificada asociada a ligamentoplastia del cruzado anterior
Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular
Uso de placa puente dorsal: una alternativa en fracturas de muñeca catastróficas
Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular
No todo es "cut-out": reclasificación de las complicaciones mecánicas del tornillo cefálico del clavo intramedular.
Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular
Solución límite para recambio de prótesis total de cadera con cotilo osteointegrado: presentación de casos
Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular
Radioterapia a bajas dosis en artrosis: ¿una opción terapéutica real o un efecto placebo sofisticado?
Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular