29-174

Tratamiento de las fracturas abiertas de libia, grados I y II. Estudio comparativo entre enclavijado con Ender y fijación externa

TREATMENT OF GRADE I-II OPEN FRACTURES OF THE TIBIAL SHAFT. A COMPARISON BETWEEN ENDER NAILING AND EXTERNAL FIXATION

A. J. GARBAYO MARTURET, J. REDIN BARANDIARAN* y J. J. USOZ ALFARO* Sección de Traumatología y Cirugía Ortopédica, Hospital de Estella (Navarra) y * Servicio de Traumatología y Cirugía Ortopédica, Hospital de Navarra, Pamplona.
Recepción:
09/01/2009
Aceptación:
09/01/2009
Publicación:
09/01/2009


Métricas


52

Visualizaciones


Compartir

Compartir

Resumen (ES)

A total of 73 (grade I-II) open fractures of the tibial shaft, 41 treated by Endernailing and 32 with external fixation, were retrospectively studied. Regarding the type of boneexposition, fractures were classified according to Gustilo. Fractures were also grouped followingAO criteria with regard to the fracture line. Different factors such as time period for fracturehealing, delay in union, pseudoarthrosis, infection, and functional disability were assessedin both groups of patients. Fractures treated by flexible endomedullar nailing had a mean timeperiod for healing of 3,3 months. There was no cases with union delay, but 4 patients (10%)developed pseudoarthrosis. In fractures treated with external fixation the mean time period forconsolidation was 4.1 months. In this group, there were 2 cases (6%) disclosing delay in unionand 6 developing pseudoarthrosis (19%). In absence of infection, endomedullary flexible nailinghas been shown to give better results than external fixation in the healing process of gradeI-II open fractures of the tibial shaft.

Palabras clave (ES):

Enclavado
Tibia
Fijador
Fijación
Abierta
Tratamiento
externo
Enclavijamiento
externa
Osteotaxis
Fractura
Ender

Resumen (EN)

A total of 73 (grade I-II) open fractures of the tibial shaft, 41 treated by Endernailing and 32 with external fixation, were retrospectively studied. Regarding the type of boneexposition, fractures were classified according to Gustilo. Fractures were also grouped followingAO criteria with regard to the fracture line. Different factors such as time period for fracturehealing, delay in union, pseudoarthrosis, infection, and functional disability were assessedin both groups of patients. Fractures treated by flexible endomedullar nailing had a mean timeperiod for healing of 3,3 months. There was no cases with union delay, but 4 patients (10%)developed pseudoarthrosis. In fractures treated with external fixation the mean time period forconsolidation was 4.1 months. In this group, there were 2 cases (6%) disclosing delay in unionand 6 developing pseudoarthrosis (19%). In absence of infection, endomedullary flexible nailinghas been shown to give better results than external fixation in the healing process of gradeI-II open fractures of the tibial shaft.

Explorar

Artículos


Volúmenes


Sobre la revista


Más leídos

Surgiceloma como complicación de tenodesis extraarticular de Lemaire modificada asociada a ligamentoplastia del cruzado anterior

Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular


Uso de placa puente dorsal: una alternativa en fracturas de muñeca catastróficas

Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular


No todo es "cut-out": reclasificación de las complicaciones mecánicas del tornillo cefálico del clavo intramedular.

Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular


Solución límite para recambio de prótesis total de cadera con cotilo osteointegrado: presentación de casos

Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular


Radioterapia a bajas dosis en artrosis: ¿una opción terapéutica real o un efecto placebo sofisticado?

Revista Española de Cirugía Osteoarticular